Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Almost like it's being orchestrated.

Is it just me, or do all these Democrats quitting, retiring, etc., all at once seem more ominous than had they stayed and fought it out?

3 Democrats — 2 senators, 1 governor — to retire 

Connecticut AG Blumenthal to Run for Dodd's Senate Seat 

This is hardly the entire list of stories I've seen in the past couple weeks.  I've read of governors, local reps, senators, the entire gambit (except of course, the one I really wish would go).

 Just because I have this custom fitted, shiny new tin-foil hat, I have to wonder.  It seems I've been 2 or 3 steps behind the plan for about a decade now.  Is this yet another orchestrated part of the plan?  I've never seen anything like it.  I would like to hope these politicians have seen the damage they have done and are now stepping down, rather than face the prospect of a sound trouncing at the polls.  Yet, my knowledge of politicians prevents me from quite believing this to be the case.  If they are nothing else, career politicians are, by  default, arrogant.  They really think they are doing what needs to be done.  Does this mass exodus mean their work is done?  That now all that remains is for their work to do its job?

Since I firmly believe that the Repubs and the Dems both are handled by the same puppet-masters (the globalist elites), I wonder if this seemingly orchestrated withdraw of many dems is designed to ensure a HUGE repub victory in November. This being designed to pacify the people into thinking the constitution has come back into vogue, as the Repubs are suddenly talking about their love of the Constitution again.

Meanwhile, it also ensures the same puppet-masters remain firmly in place. In other words, is this designed to take the wind out of the Tea-Party sails?

Now you know why  I am a bit worried about this. The timing is too packed.  It's all happening so "quickly", and let us not forget, "quickly" is the mantra of the BHO administration.

 

2 comments:

  1. Two things come to mind:

    Expediency, to keep the super majority of dems in congress. Those who have been given their walking papers by the polls are forced to step aside, so a new and uncontaminated by bad record dem can replace them.

    Diversion, They are to hot to handle in their present jobs, but - wait, they will pop up in some more cloaked position of power in the political power machine. Able to pull strings and deal influence more behind the scenes.

    Watch both the 'replacement' and the repositioning of these people. Although one may feel some vindication in their stepping down, do not become blind to the grand scheme.

    ReplyDelete
  2. At first I wondered if they would end up as lobbyists. As I think about it some more, I wonder if they won't end up on the Health Care board. There was a reason for the language in the bill prohibiting itself form being abolished you know.

    ReplyDelete