What is the duty of a citizen? When something, morally questionable or even morally wrong, is sanctioned and even actively supported by the government, where does the duty of the citizen lie? Does the citizen oppose the government outright and thereby jeopardize his livelyhood and his families welfare, or does the good citizen obey the government? Is the answer somewhere in between?
===
I am 47 years old and have grown quite cynical over the years. I see such hypocrisy on both end of the political spectrum, that this question becomes difficult to answer without relying on a lot of “ifs” and “ors”. I find myself unable to answer the question of a citizen’s duty without first examining the hypocrisy and contradictions of the recent past. For the sake of this discussion, I will be forced to generalize somewhat, referring to the “left” and the “right” as if both camps walked in lock step. I know this is not accurate, but it should help the conversation move smoothly, and I am disclaiming it now; I understand there are a wide varieties of opinions and beliefs among both the “left” and the “right”.
My main topic will be the current war in the middle east. I remember clearly how the Bush supporters were so aghast that anyone would dare disagree publicly with a US President during a time of war. President Bush even went so far as to outlaw many forms of war protest through Executive Order (Livingston, 2007). President Bush proclaimed “I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, find that, due to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by acts of violence threatening the peace and stability of Iraq and undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq and to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people, it is in the interests of the United States to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, and expanded in Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004." Of course, the “left” howled (Livingston, 2007)! This editorial I cite includes an Editor’s Note, which reads “Ed. Note: The United States government actively seeks to find, and silence, any and all opinions about the United States except those coming from authorized government and/or affiliated sources, of which we are not one.” I clearly remember in 2003, when the Left was going after Bush with everything it had – remember Bush lied and people died? – it fell to Hillary Clinton to defend political speech. She said. “I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you’re not patriotic.” She went on to say that dissent is perfectly proper no matter what administration is in power. Well, that was THAT Clinton and that was then (Woolley, 2010). Now, with a African American from the “left” holding the office of President, while largely running his war policy in largely parallel with Bush’s, Dissent Is No Longer Patriotic…It Is Racist (Harvey, 2008).
To address the question of the duty of the citizen, as it relates to non-compliance with government wishes, I believe we would be better off as a whole to listen to our own individual sense of right and wrong. For too long, people have simply fallen into lock step with their political party of choice. I don’t believe it to be patriotic to blindly adhere to government wishes or laws. I don’t believe it to be patriotic to automatically support or oppose the government based on which party is currently in power. Because of the incredible power of our federal government, I believe dissent or outright disobedience must be a matter of personal conviction.
Works Cited:
Harvey, M. (2008, November 6). Yes indeed. Stalin and Lenin and Marx would be proud. Retrieved July 1, 2010, from Canada Free Press: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/6108
Livingston, D. (2007, July 20). Bush Outlaws War Protest - Citizens Face Full Asset Seizure. Retrieved July 1, 2010, from rense.com: http://www.rense.com/general77/asset.htm
Woolley, L. (2010, April 18). Clinton VS Clinton -- Dissent & Patriotism. Retrieved July 01, 2010, from The Lynn Woolley Show: http://www.belogical.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=361:clinton-vs-clinton-dissent-a-patriotism&catid=20:secretaryoflogic&Itemid=83
I have been preaching it was years, we're done for. We are not the same as the "Greatest Generation". Our soldiers maybe as good or better, butt our nation a whole has turned into a bunch of Godless punks and whores sucking everything out of the rest of what's left of the God fearing, free American culture. We, that do not die fighting obama's progressive regimes' game-plan are doomed to become serfs serving a mongrel nation of nonbelievers, corrupt governments leaders, criminals, and sodomites. This shall be Gods will. We, Americans, the most Blessed of all the nations on the world have have become stiff-necked and turned our backs on God, and are now worshiping false idols. It is time for the Lord's rod to punish America that has failed Him soo grossly. It will not be pretty, it will be painful. Man's inhumanity to man, proves the total depravity of man. With out the Grace of GOD, you and I have no chance.
ReplyDeleteWell said LOP,
ReplyDeleteThough you express anger with the current regime (aren't we all...), your apparent willingness to disobey the gov't comes from a deep seated personal conviction. Not out of some sense of loyalty (God) to a particular party.
You are still the man I remember from all those years ago.
Sorry LOP,
ReplyDeleteI don't seem to be able to edit my comment.
I meant to put (God) after "deep seated personal conviction (God).
The way I typed it, it would appear I am saying "Not out of some sense of loyalty to God", which is my mistake for typing so soon after waking up.
So to start all over:
...(aren't we all....), your apparent willingness to disobey the gov't comes from a deep seated personal conviction (God). Not from some sense of loyalty to a particular party.
Sorry for the typing mistake.
S
That's OK Tutmoil,..prople have been mis-quoting and not understanding me for a long, long time. GOD BLESS us all.
ReplyDeleteNever forget POW/MIA's - 9/11
ride free/live free thru CHRIST.
lop.
Today, i know people hate to have anyone prove a point by quoting the Bible,....butt, the Book says it all.
ReplyDeletePsalm 14:3 All have turned aside, they have together become corrupt; there is no one who does good, not even one. ... They have together become corrupt. ...
//bible.cc/psalms/14-3.htm - 15k
Psalm 53:3 Everyone has turned away, they have together become corrupt; there is no one who does good, not even one. ...
//bible.cc/psalms/53-3.htm - 15k
Romans 3:12 All have turned aside from the right path; they have every one of them become corrupt....They have all turned aside. They have together become unprofitable. ...
//bible.cc/romans/3-12.htm - 16k
AND THAT REFERS TO US, so you may ask what's the point? Through man nothing can be done, through GOD all things are possible through His saving Grace.
Texas 1845, Preamble We the People of the Republic of Texas, acknowledging, with gratitude, the grace and beneficence of God.
never forget POW/MIA's - 9/11
ride free/live free thru CHRIST
lop
Lop,
ReplyDeleteYou are exactly what this country needs at this moment. Though some (not including myself) may ridicule you for your deep faith, it is this type of personal conviction that will tide you over through the coming years.
Those who have no loyalty, except to a person or group of people, are the people I worry most about. Those who are only loyal to a political party are those from whom the turncoats backstabbers are born.
Turmoil